Produce a structured argumentative text: thesis, arguments, conclusion.
A student delivers a short argumentative monologue on whether AI should be regulated.
Tap the phrase to hear it, then press the mic and repeat — we score your pronunciation for real (Chrome/Edge).
Practise this dialogue live with a native-trained tutor. Next session opens soon.
Tap any line to hear it. Grammar appears in context, never as a dry rule.
An argumentative piece follows a clear arc. Introduction: state the thesis (« Sostengo que… », « A modo de introducción… »). Body: ordered arguments (« En primer lugar », « En segundo lugar », « Asimismo ») each supported with evidence, plus a concession-rebuttal (« Es cierto que… no obstante… »). Conclusion: restate and call to action (« En definitiva », « Abogo por… »). Cohesion comes from reusing every B2 tool: the subjunctive of purpose (« para que no discriminen »), the pasiva refleja (« se vulnera la privacidad »), counterfactuals (« si hubieran actuado, no estaríamos… »), and varied connectors. Keep one idea per paragraph and let the thesis echo in the conclusion without copying it verbatim.
Write a full argumentative paragraph (6–8 sentences) on a B2 topic: thesis → two arguments → concession-rebuttal → conclusion. Use the subjunctive, one passive form and at least three connectors.
An adaptive quiz confirms you've got it and schedules the right words for review.