Venn Method for Syllogism
The diagram method removes all guesswork. Draw circles to satisfy the statements in the most general way, then test the conclusion: if you can draw even one legal diagram where it fails, reject it.
The 3-step method
- Draw the universals first. "All" and "No" fix the layout — they leave no freedom.
- Add the "Some" overlaps in the most general way — keep circles as separate as the statement allows, so you don't accidentally create links that weren't given.
- Test the conclusion against the picture. Then deliberately try to redraw it to BREAK the conclusion. If you can't, it follows; if you can, it doesn't.
Worked example — why two "Somes" prove nothing
Statements: Some A are B. Some B are C. Conclusion: Some A are C?
Both "Some" statements are satisfied (A meets B, B meets C), yet A and C are completely apart. Because we found one legal diagram that breaks it, the conclusion fails.
Contrast — a chain that DOES follow
All A are B. No B is C. Conclusion: No A is C. Since A sits entirely inside B, and B is wholly separate from C, A cannot reach C in any diagram — so it follows.
✅ Solved examples
✏️ Practice — try these, take hints as needed
📝 Topic test — 8 questions
Auto-graded with full solutions; saved to your dashboard. Use the calculator and formula sheet (top-right) any time.
Formula Reference Sheet
The four statement types
| All A are B | A circle sits fully inside B |
|---|---|
| No A is B | A and B circles are separate |
| Some A are B | A and B circles overlap |
| Some A are not B | part of A lies outside B |
| Golden rule | true only if it holds in EVERY valid diagram |