Criticisms & Classroom Implications
The critique questions are worth easy marks. Carol Gilligan, Kohlberg's best-known critic, argued his theory has a gender bias: it was based on male samples and prizes an 'ethic of justice' (rights, rules, abstract principles) while undervaluing the 'ethic of care' (relationships, compassion, responsibility) more often voiced by women — so women were wrongly scored lower. Other criticisms: a cultural bias toward Western individualism (collectivist cultures may reason differently yet maturely); a gap between moral reasoning and actual moral behaviour (knowing the right reasoning doesn't guarantee doing it); and that the highest stages are rare and idealised. For teaching, Kohlberg's value is the use of moral discussion: presenting dilemmas, encouraging perspective-taking and debate, and creating a 'just community' classroom — exposing students to reasoning one stage above their own gently pulls them upward (a Vygotskian echo). Moral development is fostered through reasoning and discussion, not moralising or rote rules.
✅ Solved examples
✏️ Practice — try these, take hints as needed
📝 Topic test — 8 questions
Auto-graded with full solutions; saved to your dashboard. Use the calculator and formula sheet (top-right) any time.
Key Concepts — Quick Reference
Three levels, six stages
| Level 1: Pre-conventional | S1 Obedience & punishment · S2 Self-interest ("what’s in it for me") |
|---|---|
| Level 2: Conventional | S3 Good boy/girl (approval) · S4 Law & order (duty to society) |
| Level 3: Post-conventional | S5 Social contract · S6 Universal ethical principles |
The golden rule for questions
| Judge the REASON | Stage = the justification given, not the decision (steal / don’t steal) |
|---|---|
| Typical ages | Pre-conv: childhood · Conv: adolescence+ · Post-conv: some adults (not all) |