The Heinz Dilemma & Kohlberg’s Method
Kohlberg studied moral development by presenting moral dilemmas and analysing the reasoning. In the Heinz dilemma, a woman is dying; a druggist has the only cure but charges ten times what it costs to make, and Heinz, unable to afford it or raise the money, must decide whether to steal it. Kohlberg did not care whether participants said Heinz should or should not steal — the same answer can come from different stages. What revealed the stage was why: 'don't steal, he'll be jailed' (Stage 1) versus 'don't steal, stealing breaks the law that holds society together' (Stage 4) versus 'steal, life outranks property as a universal principle' (Stage 6). This is the single most tested idea in the chapter: moral maturity is judged by the structure of the reasoning, not the content of the decision. Stages are sequential and invariant — people move up one at a time and do not skip.
✅ Solved examples
✏️ Practice — try these, take hints as needed
📝 Topic test — 8 questions
Auto-graded with full solutions; saved to your dashboard. Use the calculator and formula sheet (top-right) any time.
Key Concepts — Quick Reference
Three levels, six stages
| Level 1: Pre-conventional | S1 Obedience & punishment · S2 Self-interest ("what’s in it for me") |
|---|---|
| Level 2: Conventional | S3 Good boy/girl (approval) · S4 Law & order (duty to society) |
| Level 3: Post-conventional | S5 Social contract · S6 Universal ethical principles |
The golden rule for questions
| Judge the REASON | Stage = the justification given, not the decision (steal / don’t steal) |
|---|---|
| Typical ages | Pre-conv: childhood · Conv: adolescence+ · Post-conv: some adults (not all) |