Ratio of Ages
When ages are given as a ratio m:n, write them as mk and nk so a single multiplier k carries the unknown. Because the actual difference of their ages equals (n − m)k and that difference is fixed for all time, one extra fact — a known difference or a sum — instantly gives k and hence both ages. The signature CAT trap lives here: the ratio of two ages does NOT stay the same as years pass. If two ages are 3:1 today, after some years the gap is unchanged but the ratio shrinks toward 1:1, because the same constant t is added to both numbers. So "their ages are 3:1 now and will be 2:1 later" is a perfectly consistent statement — set mk + t and nk + t to the second ratio and solve. Always anchor on the invariant difference, not the moving ratio.
✅ Solved examples
✏️ Practice — try these, take hints as needed
📝 Topic test — 8 questions
Auto-graded with full solutions; saved to your dashboard. Use the calculator and formula sheet (top-right) any time.
Formula Reference Sheet
Time-shift identities
| Present age | Let present age = x years |
|---|---|
| Age t years ago | x − t |
| Age t years hence | x + t |
| Difference is constant | (a + t) − (b + t) = a − b (never changes) |
| Sum after t years | (a + t) + (b + t) = a + b + 2t |
Ratio power-tools
| Ratio to actual values | If ages are in ratio m:n, take them as mk and nk |
|---|---|
| Fixed difference fixes k | nk − mk = (n − m)k = known difference |
| Ratio now vs later | m:n at present need not stay m:n after t years |
| Average of N people | Sum of ages = N × average age |
| A is k times B now | A = kB, then shift both by ±t for past/future |